Investment Advisers Performance MonitorIAPM

  •  
View Sample Report
 
INVESPECTRA Overview: [+]  magnify   [-]
In each of the five risk profile reports, the first easier report shows the 1 year, 3 year, and 5 year performance and ranking plus the overall ranking. In the second style of report, five annualized years of performance is shown and ranked in five columns. Each Investment Adviser and their firm is shown in rows with their performance in the next row down. Overall Ranking is shown in the right column.
Confidential to: Sample Investor #1 the Investors name appears.
REGIONS: Auckland, Northland : selected regions an Investor could look for an Investment Adviser.
REPORT TO: shows the report period.
RISK PROFILE: (5 options); for further info, see left tab Resources / Risk Profiles.
TOP GREEN HIGHLIGHTED ROW: The Investors Name and Capital: so the investor quickly knows which is their report row and which is their Investment Adviser.
Four Digit number e.g. [1061] for the Investment Advisers INVESPECTRA number, Firm name, and individual Name.
The next row for each Investment Adviser is their Performance year by year, ranked year by year, and the overall ranking for that Adviser.
The right hand column shows the overall ranking over the five years.
GREEN ROW: Highlights the Investment Adviser for investor and their overall performance.
GREEN ROW Highlights the investor's returns. Note that a consequence of this format is the individual investor can see their own return against the average performance by their Investment Adviser.
Important note on confidentiality:
Scroll down to the other Risk Profile Reports. Note that there are no green lines, only averaged statistical performance data. Each line represents information from one or many investors. But no confidential information shows.

Consumer investors can rely upon the INVESPECTRA database structure that their private information cannot be seen by anyone else. The personalised login / password triggers the green and highlighted information strictly for viewing by that investor only.
 
 
Portfolio Performance Report
Confidential to: Sample Investor #1
REGIONS: Auckland, Northland
REPORT TO: 30/06/2011   RISK PROFILE: Higher Risk   TOTAL RANKED: 6
Ranking based on five year performance [refer Notes at bottom of report]
LATEST INVESTOR RETURNS:
30/06/2011   [Sample Investor #1] Closing Balance:   $33,112
   
    1 Year 3 Year 5 Year Overall
Investment Advisers         [%]  Rank [%]  Rank [%]  Rank  Rank
                       
[1061] Sample Adviser #21 - INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Takapuna         16.5 4 18.9 2 17.6 1 1
                       
[1062] Sample Adviser #22 - INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Takapuna         12.1 6 15.8 3 15.1 2 2
                       
[1041] Sample Adviser #1 - INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Takapuna         28.2 1 19.7 1 10.8 3 3
                       
[1051]         21.6 2 14.9 4 6.1 4 4
                       
[1042]         20.6 3 -12.1 5 -23.7 5 5
                       
[1052]         15.2 5 -17.0 6 -28.0 6 6
                       
NOTES:
1) returns have been calculated based on quarterly return calculations that assume cashflows occur mid-quarter.
2) returns for periods greater than a year have been annualised for overall ranking purposes. The overall ranking is only provided for Advisers that have a complete 5-year history of returns.
3) latest returns for any Adviser could be up to 2 months before the stated "Report To" date and this could be material to ranking results.
4) returns are net of tax and investment fees. Each adviser return may consist of one or more investors with different tax rates. The "average" tax rate of each adviser will therefore depend on the tax rate of the individual investors and the size and composition of their investment.
5) to assist readers interpret the results we show the "average tax rate" associated with each investment return. The "average tax rate" is calculated weighted by investment funds associated with each tax rate.
6) readers will need to use care and judgement in interpreting the results because the "average tax rate" will vary from Adviser to Adviser.
 
Portfolio Performance Report
Confidential to: Sample Investor #1
REGIONS: Auckland, Northland
REPORT TO: 30/06/2011   RISK PROFILE: Higher Risk   TOTAL RANKED: 6
Ranking based on five year performance [refer Notes at bottom of report]
LATEST INVESTOR RETURNS:
30/06/2011   [Sample Investor #1] Closing Balance:   $33,112
   
[2007]   [2008]   [2009]   [2010]   [2011]   Overall  
Year Five Rank Year Four Rank Year Three Rank Year Two Rank Year One Rank Rank   
[1061] Average Tax
Rate 33%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Takapuna Sample Adviser #21
11.1% 1 -11.0% 4 -3.0% 2 5.2% 6 16.5% 4 1
[1062] Average Tax
Rate 30%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Takapuna Sample Adviser #22
10.5% 2 -10.1% 3 -2.8% 1 6.3% 3 12.1% 6 2
[1041] Average Tax
Rate 30%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Takapuna Sample Adviser #1
2.3% 5 -9.5% 2 -15.6% 4 10.6% 2 24.9% 1 3
[1041] [Your Individual Portfolio]
2.3%   -9.5%   -15.6%   10.6%   24.9%    
[1051] Average Tax
Rate 33%
2.1% 6 -9.5% 2 -15.1% 3 11.2% 1 21.6% 2 4
[1042] Average Tax
Rate 33%
5.4% 3 -17.6% 6 -31.3% 5 6.0% 4 18.2% 3 5
[1052] Average Tax
Rate 30%
5.3% 4 -17.6% 5 -31.6% 6 5.4% 5 15.2% 5 6
NOTES:
1) returns have been calculated based on quarterly return calculations that assume cashflows occur mid-quarter.
2) returns for periods greater than a year have been annualised for overall ranking purposes. The overall ranking is only provided for Advisers that have a complete 5-year history of returns.
3) latest returns for any Adviser could be up to 2 months before the stated "Report To" date and this could be material to ranking results.
4) returns are net of tax and investment fees. Each adviser return may consist of one or more investors with different tax rates. The "average" tax rate of each adviser will therefore depend on the tax rate of the individual investors and the size and composition of their investment.
5) to assist readers interpret the results we show the "average tax rate" associated with each investment return. The "average tax rate" is calculated weighted by investment funds associated with each tax rate.
6) readers will need to use care and judgement in interpreting the results because the "average tax rate" will vary from Adviser to Adviser.
 
Portfolio Performance Report
Confidential to: Sample Investor #1
REGIONS: Auckland, Northland
REPORT TO: 30/06/2011   RISK PROFILE: Medium / High.   TOTAL RANKED: 6
Ranking based on five year performance [refer Notes at bottom of report]
[2007]   [2008]   [2009]   [2010]   [2011]   Overall  
Year Five Rank Year Four Rank Year Three Rank Year Two Rank Year One Rank Rank   
[1063] Average Tax
Rate 30%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Long Bay Sample Adviser #23
21.1% 1 -10.5% 4 -7.2% 2 4.0% 5 16.1% 2 1
[1064] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Rothesay Bay Sample Adviser #24
5.0% 4 -0.3% 1 4.3% 1 3.4% 6 1.8% 6 2
[1044] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
2.0% 6 -3.9% 3 -16.2% 3 8.4% 4 11.1% 4 3
[1054] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
2.0% 5 -3.9% 2 -16.6% 4 8.4% 3 10.2% 5 4
[1043] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
6.8% 3 -16.9% 6 -21.6% 5 11.6% 2 17.0% 1 5
[1053] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
6.9% 2 -16.9% 6 -22.0% 6 12.0% 1 16.0% 3 6
NOTES:
1) returns have been calculated based on quarterly return calculations that assume cashflows occur mid-quarter.
2) returns for periods greater than a year have been annualised for overall ranking purposes. The overall ranking is only provided for Advisers that have a complete 5-year history of returns.
3) latest returns for any Adviser could be up to 2 months before the stated "Report To" date and this could be material to ranking results.
4) returns are net of tax and investment fees. Each adviser return may consist of one or more investors with different tax rates. The "average" tax rate of each adviser will therefore depend on the tax rate of the individual investors and the size and composition of their investment.
5) to assist readers interpret the results we show the "average tax rate" associated with each investment return. The "average tax rate" is calculated weighted by investment funds associated with each tax rate.
6) readers will need to use care and judgement in interpreting the results because the "average tax rate" will vary from Adviser to Adviser.
 
Portfolio Performance Report
Confidential to: Sample Investor #1
REGIONS: Auckland, Northland
REPORT TO: 30/06/2011   RISK PROFILE: Medium   TOTAL RANKED: 7
Ranking based on five year performance [refer Notes at bottom of report]
[2007]   [2008]   [2009]   [2010]   [2011]   Overall  
Year Five Rank Year Four Rank Year Three Rank Year Two Rank Year One Rank Rank   
[1045] Average Tax
Rate 30%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Castor Bay Sample Adviser #5
3.2% 6 5.2% 5 3.5% 2 9.9% 5 5.8% 3 1
[1046] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
3.5% 4 5.4% 2 3.6% 1 10.3% 3 4.4% 4 2
[1055] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Takapuna Sample Adviser #15
3.3% 5 5.2% 5 3.3% 3 9.9% 4 4.3% 5 3
[1056] Average Tax
Rate 30%
3.7% 3 5.4% 3 1.5% 4 10.8% 2 3.9% 6 4
[1031] Average Tax
Rate 30%
2.0% 7 5.5% 1 0.4% 5 5.4% 7 3.5% 7 5
[1065] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
16.2% 1 -1.0% 7 -14.5% 7 11.5% 1 6.8% 2 6
[1066] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
13.2% 2 1.8% 6 -14.3% 6 9.8% 6 7.5% 1 7
NOTES:
1) returns have been calculated based on quarterly return calculations that assume cashflows occur mid-quarter.
2) returns for periods greater than a year have been annualised for overall ranking purposes. The overall ranking is only provided for Advisers that have a complete 5-year history of returns.
3) latest returns for any Adviser could be up to 2 months before the stated "Report To" date and this could be material to ranking results.
4) returns are net of tax and investment fees. Each adviser return may consist of one or more investors with different tax rates. The "average" tax rate of each adviser will therefore depend on the tax rate of the individual investors and the size and composition of their investment.
5) to assist readers interpret the results we show the "average tax rate" associated with each investment return. The "average tax rate" is calculated weighted by investment funds associated with each tax rate.
6) readers will need to use care and judgement in interpreting the results because the "average tax rate" will vary from Adviser to Adviser.
 
Portfolio Performance Report
Confidential to: Sample Investor #1
REGIONS: Auckland, Northland
REPORT TO: 30/06/2011   RISK PROFILE: Low / Medium   TOTAL RANKED: 6
Ranking based on five year performance [refer Notes at bottom of report]
[2007]   [2008]   [2009]   [2010]   [2011]   Overall  
Year Five Rank Year Four Rank Year Three Rank Year Two Rank Year One Rank Rank   
[1048] Average Tax
Rate 10.5%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Takapuna Sample Adviser #8
3.7% 5 5.5% 4 3.9% 3 18.4% 3 6.0% 3 1
[1047] Average Tax
Rate 10.5%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Takapuna Sample Adviser #7
3.8% 4 5.5% 2 4.0% 2 18.6% 2 5.4% 4 2
[1058] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Takapuna Sample Adviser #18
3.6% 6 5.5% 3 5.9% 1 18.3% 4 3.6% 6 3
[1057] Average Tax
Rate 10.5%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Northcote Sample Adviser #17
3.9% 3 5.5% 1 2.1% 4 18.7% 1 4.7% 5 4
[1068] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
10.7% 2 -2.6% 5 -4.4% 5 11.5% 5 8.4% 2 5
[1067] Average Tax
Rate 10.5%
14.0% 1 -6.4% 6 -8.0% 6 8.1% 6 10.9% 1 6
NOTES:
1) returns have been calculated based on quarterly return calculations that assume cashflows occur mid-quarter.
2) returns for periods greater than a year have been annualised for overall ranking purposes. The overall ranking is only provided for Advisers that have a complete 5-year history of returns.
3) latest returns for any Adviser could be up to 2 months before the stated "Report To" date and this could be material to ranking results.
4) returns are net of tax and investment fees. Each adviser return may consist of one or more investors with different tax rates. The "average" tax rate of each adviser will therefore depend on the tax rate of the individual investors and the size and composition of their investment.
5) to assist readers interpret the results we show the "average tax rate" associated with each investment return. The "average tax rate" is calculated weighted by investment funds associated with each tax rate.
6) readers will need to use care and judgement in interpreting the results because the "average tax rate" will vary from Adviser to Adviser.
 
Portfolio Performance Report
Confidential to: Sample Investor #1
REGIONS: Auckland, Northland
REPORT TO: 30/06/2011   RISK PROFILE: Low Risk   TOTAL RANKED: 7
Ranking based on five year performance [refer Notes at bottom of report]
[2007]   [2008]   [2009]   [2010]   [2011]   Overall  
Year Five Rank Year Four Rank Year Three Rank Year Two Rank Year One Rank Rank   
[1069] Average Tax
Rate 10.5%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Northcote Sample Adviser #29
6.2% 3 5.2% 2 2.0% 5 13.4% 1 0.7% 7 1
[1059] Average Tax
Rate 10.5%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Browns Bay Sample Adviser #19
5.8% 7 5.3% 1 9.1% 1 3.3% 2 1.5% 6 2
[1050] Average Tax
Rate 10.5%
6.2% 4 4.8% 5 4.7% 2 1.6% 5 4.1% 2 3
[1049] Average Tax
Rate 17.5%
5.8% 6 5.0% 4 4.1% 3 2.7% 4 3.8% 3 4
[1070] Average Tax
Rate 10.5%
INVESPECTRA SAMPLE FIRM, Rothesay Bay Sample Adviser #30
5.9% 5 5.0% 3 4.0% 4 2.9% 3 2.3% 5 5
[1060] Average Tax
Rate 10.5%
6.3% 2 4.5% 6 -0.1% 6 0.9% 6 3.4% 4 6
[1037] Average Tax
Rate 33%
10.0% 1 -8.7% 7 9.1% 1 7
NOTES:
1) returns have been calculated based on quarterly return calculations that assume cashflows occur mid-quarter.
2) returns for periods greater than a year have been annualised for overall ranking purposes. The overall ranking is only provided for Advisers that have a complete 5-year history of returns.
3) latest returns for any Adviser could be up to 2 months before the stated "Report To" date and this could be material to ranking results.
4) returns are net of tax and investment fees. Each adviser return may consist of one or more investors with different tax rates. The "average" tax rate of each adviser will therefore depend on the tax rate of the individual investors and the size and composition of their investment.
5) to assist readers interpret the results we show the "average tax rate" associated with each investment return. The "average tax rate" is calculated weighted by investment funds associated with each tax rate.
6) readers will need to use care and judgement in interpreting the results because the "average tax rate" will vary from Adviser to Adviser.